60009 on the move
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
Re: 60009 on the move
Is it using the new turntable between 1317 and 1403?
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: 60009 on the move
There's a few photos of *cough* 5972 on the new turntable floating around google. Would be nice to see photos of No.9 on it if anyone could get them
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
-
- H&BR Q10 0-8-0
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:38 am
Re: 60009 on the move
The leading bogie of the support coach is derailed in Platform 10 at York. Not good.
Mark
Mark
-
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 4233
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:46 am
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: 60009 on the move
Very fortunate the coach was derailed and not No.9
Network rail need to get their act together, first 47500 in Manchester and now this
Network rail need to get their act together, first 47500 in Manchester and now this
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
Re: 60009 on the move
No mate was already facing the right way.Bryan wrote:Is it using the new turntable between 1317 and 1403?
- StevieG
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2342
- Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
- Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.
Re: 60009 on the move
Shall we confine further posts about the derailment to the "LNER News" Forum's "It wasn't the engines fault" thread, here?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8351
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8351
BZOH
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
/\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Re: 60009 on the move
60009 made it safely to Carnforth this afternoon.
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: 60009 on the move
Goodo. Any news on the whereabouts of the smokebox numberplate?
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
Re: 60009 on the move
In the support coach. Ran out of time to re-fit it.
Re: 60009 on the move
Think your making a bit of an assumption there. Its not yet known what caused 47500 to derail. I know that the people involved are keeping very shtung about it at the moment about it.Blackout60800 wrote:
Network rail need to get their act together, first 47500 in Manchester and now this
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
Re: 60009 on the move
Copied this from NP posted on (29-1-13)
Two interesting bits of news today , seems a check rail has mysteriously appeared on Ordsall Curve over the weekend and today NR have put out a safety notice (forget the official name of said docuement) and contains this interesting bit -
Class 47 loco being hauled at the rear of an empty train derailed all wheels due to flange climb
The wheels on the loco had just been turned on a wheel lathe. It had only travelled a few miles from there
A short section of track in the vicinity was below 160m radius. It was not fitted with a check rail
Rail flange lubrication at the site was ineffective
The derailment may be the result of a fault on the loco, a fault with the carriages, ineffective lubrication, or a combination of them together with other factors
Effective rail flange lubrication on sharp curves is an essential risk control measure, not only to protect rails and train wheels from excessive wear, but also to reduce the risk of flange climb
However we will need to wait and see what any RAIB report into the incident tells us but there was another case of Flange climb at Reading
http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/inv ... 022013.cfm
Two interesting bits of news today , seems a check rail has mysteriously appeared on Ordsall Curve over the weekend and today NR have put out a safety notice (forget the official name of said docuement) and contains this interesting bit -
Class 47 loco being hauled at the rear of an empty train derailed all wheels due to flange climb
The wheels on the loco had just been turned on a wheel lathe. It had only travelled a few miles from there
A short section of track in the vicinity was below 160m radius. It was not fitted with a check rail
Rail flange lubrication at the site was ineffective
The derailment may be the result of a fault on the loco, a fault with the carriages, ineffective lubrication, or a combination of them together with other factors
Effective rail flange lubrication on sharp curves is an essential risk control measure, not only to protect rails and train wheels from excessive wear, but also to reduce the risk of flange climb
However we will need to wait and see what any RAIB report into the incident tells us but there was another case of Flange climb at Reading
http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/inv ... 022013.cfm