60009 on the move

This forum is for the discussion of the locomotives, motive power, and rolling stock of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
jamieP
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 pm
Contact:

60009 on the move

Post by jamieP »

Bryan
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: York

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by Bryan »

Is it using the new turntable between 1317 and 1403?
User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by 60800 »

There's a few photos of *cough* 5972 on the new turntable floating around google. Would be nice to see photos of No.9 on it if anyone could get them
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
markindurham
H&BR Q10 0-8-0
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by markindurham »

The leading bogie of the support coach is derailed in Platform 10 at York. Not good.

Mark
jwealleans
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 4233
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:46 am

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by jwealleans »

User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by 60800 »

Very fortunate the coach was derailed and not No.9

Network rail need to get their act together, first 47500 in Manchester and now this :evil:
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
jamieP
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 pm
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by jamieP »

Bryan wrote:Is it using the new turntable between 1317 and 1403?
No mate was already facing the right way.
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2342
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by StevieG »

Shall we confine further posts about the derailment to the "LNER News" Forum's "It wasn't the engines fault" thread, here?
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=8351
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
jamieP
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 pm
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by jamieP »

60009 made it safely to Carnforth this afternoon.
User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by 60800 »

Goodo. Any news on the whereabouts of the smokebox numberplate?
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
jamieP
LNER J94 0-6-0ST Austerity
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Sep 04, 2009 9:40 pm
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by jamieP »

In the support coach. Ran out of time to re-fit it.
User avatar
60800
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2316
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
Location: N-Lincolnshire
Contact:

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by 60800 »

Thanks for the info :)
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
Coboman
GCR O4 2-8-0 'ROD'
Posts: 510
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 4:23 am
Location: GNR outpost

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by Coboman »

Blackout60800 wrote:
Network rail need to get their act together, first 47500 in Manchester and now this :evil:
Think your making a bit of an assumption there. Its not yet known what caused 47500 to derail. I know that the people involved are keeping very shtung about it at the moment about it.
Its good to know where you stand. Saves making a fool of yourself later......
Bryan
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2224
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: York

Re: 60009 on the move

Post by Bryan »

Copied this from NP posted on (29-1-13)

Two interesting bits of news today , seems a check rail has mysteriously appeared on Ordsall Curve over the weekend and today NR have put out a safety notice (forget the official name of said docuement) and contains this interesting bit -

Class 47 loco being hauled at the rear of an empty train derailed all wheels due to flange climb
The wheels on the loco had just been turned on a wheel lathe. It had only travelled a few miles from there
A short section of track in the vicinity was below 160m radius. It was not fitted with a check rail
Rail flange lubrication at the site was ineffective
The derailment may be the result of a fault on the loco, a fault with the carriages, ineffective lubrication, or a combination of them together with other factors
Effective rail flange lubrication on sharp curves is an essential risk control measure, not only to protect rails and train wheels from excessive wear, but also to reduce the risk of flange climb


However we will need to wait and see what any RAIB report into the incident tells us but there was another case of Flange climb at Reading
http://www.raib.gov.uk/publications/inv ... 022013.cfm
Post Reply