Bilton Junction Workbench

This forum is for the discussion of railway modelling of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

User avatar
Atlantic 3279
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 6534
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:51 am
Location: 2850, 245

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by Atlantic 3279 »

Having encountered recently, in the course of building a model, evidence of three distinctly different sets of underframe characteristics within a fairly small group of Doncaster-built pantry-thirds which (probably) all were originally built with the same body layout, the variation you've found within a group of ten comes as no shock to me.

It is nonetheless frustrating when it is not possible to simply get on and build the model......
Most subjects, models and techniques covered in this thread are now listed in various categories on page1

Dec. 2018: Almost all images that disappeared from my own thread following loss of free remote hosting are now restored.
JonBates
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:48 am
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by JonBates »

Over the last couple of weeks I have made some progress. I think it is fair to say that I find the roof to be one of the most awkward parts of a coach. Shame really....because that’s the bit we probably see most of on a model!

Anyway the roof was glued on and then filling and filing commenced.....again and again. Until this stage was reached
7ACEA245-C2C8-41DE-AFF1-B052FFE2C800.jpeg
I then noticed that some of the top lights were missing the central divider on the etch.....so bits of plastic were inserted like this
CC989E9C-3589-4208-ABD0-743E2AFA0ADF.jpeg
Then a good clean up and some primer to reveal any final blemishes to sort out.
Side 1
0FEBF6A8-A72E-43D1-A7C7-0A1D4FF78FE0.jpeg
Side 2
32DA605D-F0B0-464C-B46A-979BB808100E.jpeg
Now to study the photos and correct any defects that the naked eye ( and it’s rose tint) have ignored. Already spotted a few....
JonBates
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:48 am
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by JonBates »

Atlantic 3279 wrote: Sun May 24, 2020 5:18 pm Having encountered recently, in the course of building a model, evidence of three distinctly different sets of underframe characteristics within a fairly small group of Doncaster-built pantry-thirds which (probably) all were originally built with the same body layout, the variation you've found within a group of ten comes as no shock to me.

It is nonetheless frustrating when it is not possible to simply get on and build the model......

Hello Graeme

Sorry for not replying sooner.

I follow your progress regularly and really like what you produce. Your attention to detail, and willingness to rework, is admirable. I sometimes find that I get too impatient to get to the end...and am tempted to ignore what is incorrect or poor quality.

I find that the research about all these variations can be really interesting. Also frustrating because sometimes the answer is that no one knows. There is also a balance to strike between research and actual model making. All in all, this is what makes these older coaches so fascinating for me.

Jon
User avatar
sawdust
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 423
Joined: Sun Aug 13, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by sawdust »

jwealleans wrote: Wed Apr 29, 2020 5:19 am I've never seen a photo of one of these scumbled - I believe they were in brown paint immediately after the Lake. The two I built were finished like that.
There is a problem, especially with works photographs, often you can't see the grain even on a teak carriage. So just because a non teak carriage doesn't look scumbled, doesn't mean it isn't.

So if they would scumble and line (complete with shadow line, to make it look beaded) a steel panelled Gresley BGP, of which I have seen evidence, would they paint a relatively new non teak carriage brown?

I suspect not.

Sawdust.
JonBates
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:48 am
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by JonBates »

The colour conundrum! I’m in two minds about this I must say. One of the reasons that progress slowed on the coach modelling was that I spent way too much time on research!

I searched the NERA online photo archive and could not see anything definitive. There are a few photos that I’d like to see in the flesh, so to speak, because the thumbnails online are not totally clear. I suspect that visiting the archive is some way off though.

I then searched through some of the back copies of North Eastern express that are online. That was very interesting - especially the eye witness accounts of North Eastern operations etc. I really should have made better notes about some of the articles. There were a number of references to the NER coaches being re-painted from Lake to Teak. The question still remains, though, a solid brown teak colour or scumbled?

A comment on the NERA website forum pointed out that Harris said on page 40 that the formally painted coaches were painted mock teak and then gives details of the process, including the graining.

Finally I have seen a suggestion that they were scumbled until the 1928 economies were implemented.

I have not finally decided what to do about my model coach. My instinct tells me that they were front line coaches until the early to mid 1930s and would have been well kept. It is probable that they were supposed to be scumbled, it is possible that they actually were in the 1920s, and quite likely that, as they were cascaded in the 1930s they were painted plain brown. There are more photos from the post war period and they certainly look to be plain brown.

I’m still looking for a photo from the 1930s... :D
mick b
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3729
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 4:43 pm

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by mick b »

Personally I use a simple rule. Which is probably wrong !!

Corridor Scumbled , Non Corridor Plain Brown , I have done so on the Matchboard model I have, of the D&S Coach shown on page 1.

It would be much easier to scumble and if necessary then paint to plain Brown if new evidence ever surfaced.

Now after typing this , this beauty appeared on the dark side a few weeks ago.
LNER ex NER Coach teak.jpg
Last edited by mick b on Thu Jun 11, 2020 7:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
JonBates
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:48 am
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by JonBates »

Hi Mick

Thanks - I agree that is a lovely photo.

I like your rule and it makes sense to me.

In the end, it might come down to how I feel on the day that I decide to paint it!

Jon
jwealleans
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 4215
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:46 am

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by jwealleans »

That picture is in the BRJ special edition on the North Eastern. I've read, possibly in that same article, that a few carriages were scumbled at York after grouping as an experiment but it was dropped on grounds of both time and cost. The rule I follow is, if it was painted before the grouping (as these carriages were) then they'd be painted afterwards. My two are both brown.
JonBates
LNER N2 0-6-2T
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2018 9:48 am
Location: North Yorkshire

Re: Bilton Junction Workbench

Post by JonBates »

Hello

I’ve been very quiet on here for a few months. Distracted by life.....

On the modelling front I parked the coach while I contemplated colours and lining.
However I made some progress with the Gas Works Narrow gauge loco and also with the mock up for the layout’s gas dock.

In the spirit of finishing things I resumed work on a Raven A2. I acquired this (built but non running) off eBay. I believe that it is a hand cut Jamieson kit. It seems dimensionally accurate and mostly very well made.

Last week I decided to attend to the tender.

This was how I received the tender ( minus 40 years tarnish!)
0F814CCA-B50D-4CD0-BB7F-B18154410336.jpeg
I replaced the coal rails with some from a Bradwell kit, reduced the height of the division plates, fitted the water scope dome, toolboxes, rear handrail, Westinghouse cylinder and rear lamp bracket.
3B5F5BB7-AB04-45AB-BB49-856D3DAEE21E.jpeg
I’m pleased with the end result.

I’ll be starting on the loco body next.


As for the coach........more work to come.
Post Reply