Facing Point Locks

This forum is for the discussion of railway modelling of the LNER and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Post Reply
Jim de Griz
NER J27 0-6-0
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 8:47 pm

Facing Point Locks

Post by Jim de Griz »

Hi all,

As I am a gluten for punishment, I've decided to try and fit point rodding to my layout, even through I've already laid down ballast.....(apparently the experience of painting the rails after laying down the ballast didn't teach me anything)

I think I've got a fairly practical plan in terms of what I want to do, but I have a question regarding facing point locks.

I understand they are used when a passenger train will be over the point in the 'facing' direction.

The problem is I'm modelling a terminus, which means pretty much every point would fit the above, doubling the amount of rodding I need to squeeze into an already crowded space!

My question to the group is basically am I correct in my reasoning and every point in the below diagram requires a lock?

Jim
Attachments
Station Layout.jpg
John Palmer
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 249
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2012 7:27 pm
Location: Somerset

Re: Facing Point Locks

Post by John Palmer »

Per the 1928 edition of the Ministry of Transport's statement of Requirements for Passenger Lines, facing points on such lines and all points commonly used in the facing direction by passenger trains were required to be fitted with facing point locks. Whether all the points in your diagram would have to be fitted with FPL's depends on how the station is to be operated. If the roads serving the faces of the uppermost platform on your diagram are to be used exclusively for departures then it would not be obligatory to fit a lock to the turnout from which those two roads diverge. However, if all platform faces are to receive arriving passenger trains then all turnouts in the station throat will require FPL's. As regards the engine release crossover, I suggest that the need for locks will depend upon whether there are to be any facing movements over them by vehicles conveying passengers – if so, then locks will be required. Operating practice may make any such facing movements unnecessary, in which case locks on the crossover points will not be required.
Jim de Griz
NER J27 0-6-0
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Apr 01, 2021 8:47 pm

Re: Facing Point Locks

Post by Jim de Griz »

Thank you for the advice

My current practice is that only the two facings of the bottom platform are used for arrivals, with departures setting off from all three. Long term I intend to use the bay for passenger traffic, but currently it is only used (and signalled) for parcels traffic)

So in that case, I can dispense with a lock on the bay platform point and the upper point of the engine release crossover. The rest will need locks.

Better buy a few more kits 😝

Jim
PinzaC55
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1375
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 2:36 pm

Re: Facing Point Locks

Post by PinzaC55 »

Post Reply