Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

This forum is for the discussion of the LNER, its constituent companies, and their histories.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

User avatar
thesignalman
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

Post by thesignalman »

With apologies for being late on duty - I have had other things pre-occupying me over the last few months. Have much to catch up on.
52D wrote:Im not sure about Musselburgh layout but i would be over the moon if someone can find a Newhailes signalbox diagram.
Here is a full signal box diagram:
http://www.signalbox.org/diagrams.php?id=870
I show this as c1960 but as far as I know the only significant change since the accident would have been the addition of the second goods loop which was added in 1943.
billdonald wrote:Another good place to look if you are trawling the PRO at Kew is the MT6 series. This is the RI, BoT, MoT inspection reports for running lines and stations. Often when an accident occured, there may have been modifications to the signalling arrangements resulting in a subsequent inspection. The MT series in general are a goldmine in terms of local railway information regarding a railway location, although I have to say, I've no experience of the railway archieves of Scotland in Edinburgh. Thus my statements may only apply to England and Wales - I'm sure one of the Scottish and Northern Ireland bods will tell us if they hold and equivalent to MT6 in their records.
The MT6 files at Kew cover all lines that the BoT/MoT were responsible for, so include Scotland and Northern Ireland. However, after around 1919, only the reports exist and not the plans and other associated correspondence. And, to be honest, the nature of this accident is such that I would doubt any signalling changes would have been required.[/quote]
Saint Johnstoun wrote:As a passenger train was not involved, it is probably unlikely that due to the constraints of War, that the Ministry of Transport didn't get involved in a full enquiry. I've also checked and there does not seem to be any MOT report on this incident!
Another factor is that the poor lady who died was technically not a member of the public as she was working at the station.

However, if nothing else, the LNER would have conducted their own investigation and there may be something on record at the Scottish Record Office. If investigation revealed a "cut and dried" case, an admission of error, there would be little to justify a public enquiry.

From the information already established in this discussion, I think we should accept the Sherriff''s comments about lack of knowledge of the intricacies of railway operation. I can only think of a limited number of possible causes:
  1. That the driver was not telling the truth in saying the distant was seen "off". There is no splitting distant for the junction (and I have records to show that to be the case at least as far back as 1917) so the signal would have been interlocked to only be clearable when the main line Home and Starter were off. He admits not looking at the Home so I would say there was a good chance he did not look at the Distant either. Why? Hard to say, but there are other accidents (think Harrow) which suggest that this can happen. Drivers do have other things to do other than look at signals and it must have been so easy to not be looking out at the critical moment the signal was in view.
  2. That the signalman put the signals back and changed the route after the train had passed the Distant signal. Why? He could have been acting nefariously, or simply thought he had the train identities confused and had made things worse by thinking he had corrected an error. There is evidence of both happening occasionally elsewhere.
  3. Vandalism - there is evidence of at least one accident (Smedley Viaduct) being caused by wedging of signals in the clear position.
I have my own opinions of the most likely cause but without all of the evidence it isn't for me to say.

Kindest regards,

John
"BX there, boy!"
Signalling history: https://www.signalbox.org/
Signalling and other railway photographs: https://433shop.co.uk/
User avatar
52D
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 3968
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
Contact:

Re: Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

Post by 52D »

Very apt and concise commentary John.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
v3man
LNER J39 0-6-0
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: by the West Somerset Railway

Re: Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

Post by v3man »

Grateful thanks to The Signalman for the Newhailes junction diagram. I posted a small sketch of part of the diagram some time ago but can't think of why I never completed it at the time. 52D mentions the Musselburgh diagram, this is available from the Signalling Record Society and there is a small version on their webpage. They also have a Wallyford Sidings diagram which was the first box I ever visited in the summer of 1953 which sparked off my interest in signalling. Unfortunately a back problem has forced me to retire form signalling on the West Somerset Railway.

The last diagram I am looking for the east of Edinburgh area is Monktonhall Junction, I wonder if The Signalman has that one?
User avatar
thesignalman
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 432
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

Post by thesignalman »

v3man wrote:The last diagram I am looking for the east of Edinburgh area is Monktonhall Junction, I wonder if The Signalman has that one?
Your wish is my command, good sir:
http://www.signalbox.org/diagrams.php?id=879

Sorry that these things sometimes take time, not enough hours in the day and all that.

John
"BX there, boy!"
Signalling history: https://www.signalbox.org/
Signalling and other railway photographs: https://433shop.co.uk/
v3man
LNER J39 0-6-0
Posts: 172
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 10:54 pm
Location: by the West Somerset Railway

Re: Wartime accident No3 Musselburgh NBR section

Post by v3man »

Wonderful, thank's for that. I didn't get into Monktonhall Junction box very often as it wasn't in a position to see who was on duty from any public road or path so it could only be arranged by the co-operation of the man at Newhailes Junction or Wallyford Siding!.
Post Reply