Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard
- richard
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 5:11 pm
- Location: Wichita Falls, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Something positive that came out of this thread is that the Oakwood book is now on my list to buy in the new year - I did know of its existence, but there are always too many potential books to be read...
Usually with these controversial figures, there is something very contradictory in them especially when analyzed with simple statements like "X always designed beautiful locomotives". For example Thompson did design some ugly Pacific rebuilds but many people consider the Thompson B1s amongst the best looking British locomotives ever built. I think the same could apply to the K1s (the Peppercorn designation being more nominal than reality as it was a Thompson design he put into production). There's a contradiction in those two observations: someone with the reputation of some nasty looking rebuilds designing two good looking locos that performed well. Of course reality is more complicated!
As for the tone of threads: Yes think before posting: I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Don't aggravate disagreements - they'll quickly turn into arguments. Respect the other posters - whether they are young, old, experienced, or inexperienced.
Blackout: As an aside, most of the forum members have acquired much of our knowledge over years of reading but if you want some good background on the wider LNER, Michael Bonavia's 3 volume work is worth a read (and is very affordable on the secondhand market). Bonavia was actually on the LNER's management team in its later years so he has some inside knowledge on things like the dieselisation.
Usually with these controversial figures, there is something very contradictory in them especially when analyzed with simple statements like "X always designed beautiful locomotives". For example Thompson did design some ugly Pacific rebuilds but many people consider the Thompson B1s amongst the best looking British locomotives ever built. I think the same could apply to the K1s (the Peppercorn designation being more nominal than reality as it was a Thompson design he put into production). There's a contradiction in those two observations: someone with the reputation of some nasty looking rebuilds designing two good looking locos that performed well. Of course reality is more complicated!
As for the tone of threads: Yes think before posting: I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Don't aggravate disagreements - they'll quickly turn into arguments. Respect the other posters - whether they are young, old, experienced, or inexperienced.
Blackout: As an aside, most of the forum members have acquired much of our knowledge over years of reading but if you want some good background on the wider LNER, Michael Bonavia's 3 volume work is worth a read (and is very affordable on the secondhand market). Bonavia was actually on the LNER's management team in its later years so he has some inside knowledge on things like the dieselisation.
Richard Marsden
LNER Encyclopedia
LNER Encyclopedia
- 52D
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3968
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 3:50 pm
- Location: Reallocated now between the Lickey and GWR
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Well said Richard i agree wholeheartedly with your posting.richard wrote:Something positive that came out of this thread is that the Oakwood book is now on my list to buy in the new year - I did know of its existence, but there are always too many potential books to be read...
Usually with these controversial figures, there is something very contradictory in them especially when analyzed with simple statements like "X always designed beautiful locomotives". For example Thompson did design some ugly Pacific rebuilds but many people consider the Thompson B1s amongst the best looking British locomotives ever built. I think the same could apply to the K1s (the Peppercorn designation being more nominal than reality as it was a Thompson design he put into production). There's a contradiction in those two observations: someone with the reputation of some nasty looking rebuilds designing two good looking locos that performed well. Of course reality is more complicated!
As for the tone of threads: Yes think before posting: I've said it before, I'll say it again.
Don't aggravate disagreements - they'll quickly turn into arguments. Respect the other posters - whether they are young, old, experienced, or inexperienced.
Blackout: As an aside, most of the forum members have acquired much of our knowledge over years of reading but if you want some good background on the wider LNER, Michael Bonavia's 3 volume work is worth a read (and is very affordable on the secondhand market). Bonavia was actually on the LNER's management team in its later years so he has some inside knowledge on things like the dieselisation.
Hi interested in the area served by 52D. also researching colliery wagonways from same area.
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Thank you very much, I'll see if can get the books in due courserichard wrote:Blackout: As an aside, most of the forum members have acquired much of our knowledge over years of reading but if you want some good background on the wider LNER, Michael Bonavia's 3 volume work is worth a read (and is very affordable on the secondhand market). Bonavia was actually on the LNER's management team in its later years so he has some inside knowledge on things like the dieselisation.
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
- strang steel
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2353
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 3:54 pm
- Location: From 40F to near 82A via 88C
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Me too, but I balked at the £60 that Amazon wants for a second hand copy of the 2007 paperback reprint, although have managed to get hold of a 1971 edition for £12 which SWMBO can't really complain at.richard wrote:Something positive that came out of this thread is that the Oakwood book is now on my list to buy in the new year - I did know of its existence, but there are always too many potential books to be read...
It will have to join the "to read" queue along with vol. 2B of the RCTS green books which I have just acquired.
John. My spotting log website is now at https://spottinglogs.co.uk/spotting-rec ... s-70s-80s/
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
The two editions are very similar. If you are struggling to get a copy of the 2007 version, you may try to contact Oakwood directly. I have seen copies at their trade stands recently.strang steel wrote:Me too, but I balked at the £60 that Amazon wants for a second hand copy of the 2007 paperback reprint, although have managed to get hold of a 1971 edition for £12 which SWMBO can't really complain at.
A very interesting and well researched book that attempts to redress the balance.
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Something which has been niggling me more and more - how bad can locomotives be, which have bucket seats, electric lighting, hopper ashpans and rocker grates, V fronted cabs, full depth cabs and the best features of a Gresley Pacific in terms of the double kylchap exhaust and 225lb/250lb free steaming boilers, combined with the normal 8 wheel non corridor tender?
The more I think on it, the more I am coming round to the conclusion that there's a very strange amount of detritus posted about the Thompson Pacifics with a lot of emphasis placed on cylinder placement, ignoring all else about them.
The more I think on it, the more I am coming round to the conclusion that there's a very strange amount of detritus posted about the Thompson Pacifics with a lot of emphasis placed on cylinder placement, ignoring all else about them.
- Tom F
- LNER A3 4-6-2
- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 6:23 pm
- Location: North of the Don.....South of the Tees
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Good point....and lets be honest, if you move the cylinders forward...you get a Peppercorn Pacific (Generalizing of course)S.A.C. Martin wrote:Something which has been niggling me more and more - how bad can locomotives be, which have bucket seats, electric lighting, hopper ashpans and rocker grates, V fronted cabs, full depth cabs and the best features of a Gresley Pacific in terms of the double kylchap exhaust and 225lb/250lb free steaming boilers, combined with the normal 8 wheel non corridor tender?
The more I think on it, the more I am coming round to the conclusion that there's a very strange amount of detritus posted about the Thompson Pacifics with a lot of emphasis placed on cylinder placement, ignoring all else about them.
Tom Foster
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
Modelling the North Eastern Area of the LNER - 1935-1939
- Blink Bonny
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
- Location: The Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Ay up!
You got a point there, B1 Tom!
Once the cylinders were moved forward, this reduced the tendency for the frames to crack between the cylinders and the steam pipes to fracture. Still, Peppercorn sorted these out nicely!
You got a point there, B1 Tom!
Once the cylinders were moved forward, this reduced the tendency for the frames to crack between the cylinders and the steam pipes to fracture. Still, Peppercorn sorted these out nicely!
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
We say "sorted out"...but having put the bogie/cylinder arrangement back to where it was previously, we then get different problems - some A1s reportedly worse riders than others, etc etc, and the A2s had high theoretical tractive effort, but if Cecil J. Allen is to believed, didn't put the power down as well as other Pacific classes.
I just think there's a huge amount of fairly negative press for what were not outstanding locomotives but by no means so unbelievably flawed they didn't do their work, day in day out, like the rest of the ECML Pacific fleet. To the extent that we get Thompson = rubbish and this is perpetuated ad inifinitum without much in the way of actual evidence.
I'd be interested to hear from anyone who drove a Thompson Pacific in LNER/BR days, who wasn't from one of the Scottish depots who sent them all back, as based purely on anecdotal evidence provided by Peter Grafton, the Scottish drivers were dismissive of the Pacifics qualities before they'd even been delivered!!!
I fear it's unlikely there are any drivers out there who did drive them, still with us, sadly.
I just think there's a huge amount of fairly negative press for what were not outstanding locomotives but by no means so unbelievably flawed they didn't do their work, day in day out, like the rest of the ECML Pacific fleet. To the extent that we get Thompson = rubbish and this is perpetuated ad inifinitum without much in the way of actual evidence.
I'd be interested to hear from anyone who drove a Thompson Pacific in LNER/BR days, who wasn't from one of the Scottish depots who sent them all back, as based purely on anecdotal evidence provided by Peter Grafton, the Scottish drivers were dismissive of the Pacifics qualities before they'd even been delivered!!!
I fear it's unlikely there are any drivers out there who did drive them, still with us, sadly.
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Two minor points (without wishing to inflame the discussion):-
1. Thompson removed the V-fronted cab from his Pacific after an incident when an object was thrown through a cab spectacle injuring a footplateman. It was re-instated on the Peppercorn designs on the basis that it removed the reflection of cab lighting from the footplatemen's view.
2. The Peppercorn Pacifics did have a reputation for poor riding but I dont think that this was related directly to the placement of the cylinders. From reading one of Peter Townend's books it appears that the closest they got to fixing this in BR days was to increase the spring tension on the pony truck. I'd be interested to know how well 60163 rides and whether any specific attention was paid to the design of the springing.
1. Thompson removed the V-fronted cab from his Pacific after an incident when an object was thrown through a cab spectacle injuring a footplateman. It was re-instated on the Peppercorn designs on the basis that it removed the reflection of cab lighting from the footplatemen's view.
2. The Peppercorn Pacifics did have a reputation for poor riding but I dont think that this was related directly to the placement of the cylinders. From reading one of Peter Townend's books it appears that the closest they got to fixing this in BR days was to increase the spring tension on the pony truck. I'd be interested to know how well 60163 rides and whether any specific attention was paid to the design of the springing.
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Using the Top Gear special with Tornado for information, it appeared that it was quite rough riding on the approach up to and through Durham heading North.
Evidently, Top Gear specials are usually a load of rubbish as there is plenty of evidence to suggest that if it were the late 40's / early 50's, an A1 would have beaten that jaguar by at least an hour.
Evidently, Top Gear specials are usually a load of rubbish as there is plenty of evidence to suggest that if it were the late 40's / early 50's, an A1 would have beaten that jaguar by at least an hour.
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
More down to the track there, actually. Tornado's bogie was the A1 type but modified to be better balanced and riding. There was a lot of talk of using an A4 type front bogie in the early days as some A1s did use them at one point.blackout60800 wrote:Using the Top Gear special with Tornado for information, it appeared that it was quite rough riding on the approach up to and through Durham heading North.
Well yeah, but they did say throughout the film that the A1 road didn't exist, and that this wasn't a complete recreation...Evidently, Top Gear specials are usually a load of rubbish as there is plenty of evidence to suggest that if it were the late 40's / early 50's, an A1 would have beaten that jaguar by at least an hour.
...it was just a bit of fun, which I thoroughly enjoyed. I can be seen waving at the start of the film for just under a second whilst Clarkson is in the cab!
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Apologies for that short rant, it does genuinley annoy me that the car always has to win in any Top Gear special.S.A.C. Martin wrote:Well yeah, but they did say throughout the film that the A1 road didn't exist, and that this wasn't a complete recreation...blackout60800 wrote:Evidently, Top Gear specials are usually a load of rubbish as there is plenty of evidence to suggest that if it were the late 40's / early 50's, an A1 would have beaten that jaguar by at least an hour.
If only we still had water troughs, that jag would have been beaten by miles
Does Tornado even have a water scoop?
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
- 60800
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 2316
- Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 5:41 pm
- Location: N-Lincolnshire
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
I'm gonna conveniently answer my own question.
The water scoop was designed out of Tornado, more info on major changes here:
http://www.a1steam.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=83
The water scoop was designed out of Tornado, more info on major changes here:
http://www.a1steam.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=83
36C - Based out of 50H and 36F
- Blink Bonny
- LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
- Posts: 3946
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 9:21 pm
- Location: The Midlands
- Contact:
Re: Edward Thompson. Good or Bad
Ay up!
Another reason ET gave for the flat-fronted cab was an incident as Wiske troughs where a streamliner's front cab window was smashed by the weight of water hitting it. The fireman was, tragically, fatally injured by flying glass. The subnstitution of the plain glass with Triplex glass saw to it that was no repetition of this incident.
Another reason ET gave for the flat-fronted cab was an incident as Wiske troughs where a streamliner's front cab window was smashed by the weight of water hitting it. The fireman was, tragically, fatally injured by flying glass. The subnstitution of the plain glass with Triplex glass saw to it that was no repetition of this incident.
If I ain't here, I'm in Bilston, scoffing decent chips at last!!!!