Use of the term 'junction'

This forum is for the discussion of all railway subjects that do not include the LNER, and its constituent companies.

Moderators: 52D, Tom F, Rlangham, Atlantic 3279, Blink Bonny, Saint Johnstoun, richard

Pyewipe Junction
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

Use of the term 'junction'

Post by Pyewipe Junction »

I always thought that a junction was where two independent lines met. In cab-ride videos that I watch, I notice that it is now also used for crossovers, especially between two pairs of lines. When did this change come into use?
Last edited by Pyewipe Junction on Mon Nov 23, 2020 12:37 pm, edited 2 times in total.
65447
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1769
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2007 2:44 pm
Location: Overlooking the GEML

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by 65447 »

When people ignorant or unconcerned about the correct terminology misuse it and others similarly inclined copy them?
52A
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:50 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by 52A »

It's much worse when the junction is at a train station.
Pyewipe Junction
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by Pyewipe Junction »

This has come up on a couple of YouTube channels, including Don Coffey, who is a driver for Northern Trains, so I assume it's official railway terminology now.

As for 'train station', I don't object to that too much, as it is the place where you catch a train - cf 'bus station'.
User avatar
StevieG
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 2350
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: Near the GN main line in N.Herts.

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by StevieG »

I'm with your original thoughts on this Pyewipe Junction; in general.
But it's one of those things where there have doubtless always been exceptions and variations.

I believe historically, the term was sometimes used in pre-grouping days when a previously dead-end line of one company became a through line by a new line of a different company making end-on connection with it.

In GN days, at Belle Isle (between the two tunnels just out of King's Cross), one of the signal boxes lasting to c.1967, proclaimed "Copenhagen Junction", yet the nearest to being a junction of 'independent lines' of what it controlled was one end of the very short, steep, connecting track down from the KX Goods Yard's many tracks at Goods & Mineral box, around 200 yards away. It was mostly used by locos from KX Top Shed going back to KX station.

Yet when the north end of the 'Hertford Loop' was completed as a double track line in the 1920s, the new 35-lever box controlling its grade-separated junction connections with the main line south of Stevenage was rather modestly only named "Langley" [although maps, atlases etc. rightly call the actual junction(s), 'Langley Junction' ].

More recently (the last 25 years ?), 'junction' has - perhaps generally not by central direction - slowly become adopted, as you say, for lesser connections and running crossovers.
The most obvious example known to me appeared in the 2000s when, south of Hatfield (Herts.), a new, fast, simple running crossover from the Up Slow to the immediately adjacent, parallel, Up Fast (and with the nearest other points at least two miles away), was officially named Marshmoor Junction ! - ( around 300 yards north of the site of the former Marshmoor box.)
Last edited by StevieG on Wed Nov 25, 2020 12:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
BZOH

/
\ \ \ //\ \
/// \ \ \ \
Pyewipe Junction
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 464
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:53 am
Location: Canberra, Australia

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by Pyewipe Junction »

StevieG wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 3:49 pm I believe historically, the term was sometimes used in pre-grouping days when a previously dead-end line of one company became a through line by a new line of a different company making end-on connection with it.
For example Little Bytham Junction, where the Midland met the M&GN end-on.
Mickey
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 7:27 am
Location: London

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by Mickey »

I have also thought it a bit strange to name a place usually 'in the middle of nowhere' that may only have a remote crossover or connection(s) between several running lines and nothing else and call it a 'Junction' which in historical railway terms isn't one.

Marshmoor Junction ha ha ha... Who thought that name up??.
Last edited by Mickey on Tue Nov 24, 2020 6:09 am, edited 5 times in total.
Original start date of 2010 on the LNER forum and previously posted 4500+ posts.
52A
LNER V2 2-6-2 'Green Arrow'
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Apr 30, 2006 10:50 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by 52A »

The Institute for the Queen's English confirm that we have "Railway stations" and not "Train stations"
It is now confirmed that it is an Americanism.
kudu
LNER Thompson B1 4-6-0 'Antelope'
Posts: 622
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:34 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by kudu »

52A wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:43 pm The Institute for the Queen's English confirm that we have "Railway stations" and not "Train stations"
It is now confirmed that it is an Americanism.
I don't know whether the Institute is making a prescriptive or descriptive statement. If the former, by what right do they make their statement? If the latter, they are plain wrong. What we personally prfer is another matter.

Kudu
User avatar
billbedford
GNSR D40 4-4-0
Posts: 201
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:28 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by billbedford »

52A wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:43 pm The Institute for the Queen's English confirm that we have "Railway stations" and not "Train stations"
It is now confirmed that it is an Americanism.
Mmmm

The only 'Queen's English Institute' That Google comes up with is in Mar del Plata, Argentina.
Bill Bedford
Mousa Models
http://www.mousa-models.co.uk
markindurham
H&BR Q10 0-8-0
Posts: 189
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:38 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by markindurham »

Pyewipe Junction wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 4:12 pm
StevieG wrote: Mon Nov 23, 2020 3:49 pm I believe historically, the term was sometimes used in pre-grouping days when a previously dead-end line of one company became a through line by a new line of a different company making end-on connection with it.
For example Little Bytham Junction, where the Midland met the M&GN end-on.
Not necessarily, perhaps. The KWVR named the signal box at Damems loop "Damems Junction", on an otherwise plain stretch of line, and as I understand it, this was Midland practice?
giner
LNER A4 4-6-2 'Streak'
Posts: 1558
Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 5:17 am
Location: Alberta - ex. Stevenage

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by giner »

A junction, to me, is where two or more routes diverge/converge. Hitchin would be a good example. Langley, another. At a stretch I could lean a bit towards Stevie G's mentions of crossovers being termed 'junctions' because in the literal sense of the word they are the joining of two routings, albeit in that case, only a matter of metres apart.

On 'railway' or 'train' stations, I 'rail' at the term 'train station'. Here in Canada, they're 'railway stations'. Fair enough, as we have 'railways' and not the American 'railroads'.
Mickey
LNER A3 4-6-2
Posts: 1273
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2019 7:27 am
Location: London

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by Mickey »

Did Langley Junction box have the word 'Junction' included on the box name board?.

I have a vague feeling that both box name boards at either end of the box just had the name LANGLEY and not LANGLEY JUNCTION written on them and that box 'had a real junction' BUT I could be wrong it was 45 years ago the box was abolished?.

A later post...

The Langley Junction track layout and no mention of 'Junction' in the name?. https://www.s-r-s.org.uk/html/lner/E445.gif
Original start date of 2010 on the LNER forum and previously posted 4500+ posts.
User avatar
thesignalman
GCR D11 4-4-0 'Improved Director'
Posts: 447
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:37 pm

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by thesignalman »

markindurham wrote: Thu Nov 26, 2020 5:59 pmNot necessarily, perhaps. The KWVR named the signal box at Damems loop "Damems Junction", on an otherwise plain stretch of line, and as I understand it, this was Midland practice?
If Damems controls nothing but a loop it is not Midland Railway practice.

But it was Midland Railway practice to name boxes controlling "running junctions" (e.g. connections between Fast and Slow lines) with the suffix Junction. Not only that, but if it was a location where two tracks went to four and the additional lines were Goods lines, they would often be called "Goods Junction". But like all defined rules, there were exceptions . . .

John
"BX there, boy!"
Signalling history: https://www.signalbox.org/
Signalling and other railway photographs: https://433shop.co.uk/
BJamieson
NBR J36 0-6-0
Posts: 103
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:59 am

Re: Use of the term 'junction'

Post by BJamieson »

The ends of all the dynamic loops on the Borders Railway are referred to as 'junctions' - eg from my house in Stow I can almost see Galabank Junction which is at the north end of the loop from Bowland Junction. At the planning stage of the project the term 'points' was used, which I would regard as far more appropriate.

Interested to read about the MR use of the word - I had noticed that the main function of Renishaw Park Goods Junction (on the Midland Old Road from Chesterfield to Rotherham, which I photographed a fair bit in the early '70s) was to control the north end of the quadruple track section from Foxlow Junction (a proper junction) but I didn't realise it was MR policy .

Bill
Post Reply